AML compliance monitoring · engineering partner
AML transaction monitoring software,
engineered as a system you own.
TrustChange builds AML transaction monitoring software for EU-facing VASPs, PSPs, EMIs, neobanks and banks. We engineer the screening pipeline, the monitoring rules, KYC and KYB (including deepfake-aware liveness), wallet-risk enrichment and the case output as bespoke code under your brand — not a rented SaaS with a per-alert fee. You get an AML compliance screening solution your engineers can extend, your MLRO can defend and your auditor can read.
- EU-based engineers
- MiCA-ready architecture
- AML & Travel Rule aware
- GDPR-aware storage
What "monitoring software" means here
An AML compliance monitoring platform built for your rails, not a generic tenant
Most AML compliance screening products are multi-tenant SaaS with a fixed rule set and a vendor lock behind a licence. We work the other way. TrustChange is a compliance engineering partner: your rails, your rules, your vendors, your data, your code. What you buy is engineering — a monitoring pipeline that fits how your MLRO already thinks and how your regulator already asks.
Deciding whether to build, wrap or replace an incumbent? Start with CTO advisory. Analyst tooling in depth: AML case management software development.
Subsystems
Three subsystems inside every AML compliance screening solution we build
An AML platform is not one service. It is screening, monitoring and identity that must agree on every customer and every transaction. We build the three together, on one plan, with one team accountable end to end.
-
01
Screening pipeline
Sanctions, PEP and adverse-media screening on customers, counterparties and beneficiaries. Vendors are pluggable; verdicts are versioned.
- Sanctions / PEP / adverse media
- Per-decision vendor id
- Retry with reason
-
02
Transaction monitoring engine
Rule-based and scenario-based alerts across fiat and crypto legs, with velocity, structuring, mule-network and geo-risk detectors.
- Rule + scenario engine
- Wallet-risk enrichment
- Per-alert typology
-
03
KYC / KYB with liveness
Document and liveness checks in onboarding and step-up, wired to your identity vendor and to the case queue when a check fails.
- Document + liveness
- Deepfake-aware liveness
- Ongoing due diligence
Stack
What sits behind AML compliance and fraud detection
Eight layers, one system. Every layer names an owner, a control and a piece of audit evidence — nothing is left implied under the "AI-powered" label.
Delivery patterns and evidence: how we deliver. Wider platform view: fintech infrastructure.
| Layer | What we build |
|---|---|
| Customer & counterparty screening | Sanctions, PEP and adverse-media screening with allow-lists, tolerances and audit-ready output AML compliance sanction screening runs on onboarding and on every scheduled recheck. |
| Transaction ingest | Adapters for card, SEPA, open-banking, on-chain and internal event streams Every source is versioned; the same input can be replayed deterministically. |
| Rules & scenarios | Rule-based checks (velocity, threshold, structuring) and scenario detectors (mule, layering, wash) Rules are configuration, not code — reviewable by your MLRO and second line. |
| Wallet screening | Wallet-risk vendor lookups, on-chain heuristics and address allow-lists / block-lists Wallet screening tools for AML compliance sit in the same pipeline as fiat screening. |
| KYC & KYB, incl. liveness | Document verification, PoA and liveness with deepfake-aware detection, ongoing due diligence Vendor result and evidence bundle are stored per customer, not passed through. |
| Case output | Alerts open cases in the analyst queue with typology, severity, evidence and SLAs Handover to our AML case management software development, or to your own tool. |
| Regulatory reporting | SAR/STR draft output, audit exports and periodic reports for supervisor requests Nothing is filed automatically; drafts are queued for the MLRO to review and submit. |
| Controls & access | Role-based access, four-eyes on overrides, tamper-evident logs, GDPR-aware storage Every override captures who / what / why / when and retention is per your policy. |
Screening flow
From onboarding to a defensible report
Every customer and every transaction in the AML transaction monitoring software goes through the same gates before a case opens or a report drafts. Speed comes from tuning the pipeline, not from skipping a step.
- 01
Onboard
Real time
KYC / KYB with document, PoA and deepfake-aware liveness; failed checks queue a case.
- 02
Screen
Real time + scheduled
Sanctions, PEP and adverse-media checks on entry and on every recheck; verdicts stored per decision.
- 03
Ingest
Continuous
Fiat and crypto legs land in the pipeline with a source-run id and a checksum.
- 04
Monitor
Real time
Rules and scenarios evaluate every event; wallet risk enriches on-chain legs.
- 05
Alert
Sub-second
Above-threshold matches open cases in the analyst queue with typology and SLA.
- 06
Report
Per policy
Confirmed cases queue SAR/STR drafts; the MLRO reviews and files under your process.
Delivery
How we deliver AML compliance tracking and monitoring
Five steps, in this order. Monitoring work runs inside the product backlog — no separate compliance phase bolted on before launch, no big-bang release of an untested wallet screening tool.
- 01
Scoping
Weeks 1–2
We map rails, sources, licence context, current vendors, MLRO expectations and reporting cadence. Output: a scope, a control map and a costed plan.
- 02
Architecture
Weeks 3–4
Screening topology, rule model, KYC flow and case-output contract written down first. Supervisor expectations shape the design, not a later patch.
- 03
Build
Two-week sprints
Screening, monitoring, KYC and reports ship in slices. Rules are tested against historical data before they hit production.
- 04
Hardening
Before launch
Replay against historical alerts, load work, failure drills and a third-party review window. Cut-over is rehearsed with your MLRO, not assumed.
- 05
Launch and run
Cutover + ongoing
Named engineers on 24/7 cover. Runbooks, rule playbooks and the audit bundle are handed to your team on day one.
Engagement
Four ways to buy your AML transaction monitoring build
Same engineers, same standard. Only the commercial shape changes.
-
Fixed-scope build
A defined monitoring pipeline at a fixed price and date. Best when rails and vendors are settled.
-
Dedicated team
A standing squad with a lead. Best for long roadmaps and new rules each quarter.
-
Staff augmentation
Senior engineers inside your team. Best when you already own the plan and need AML depth.
-
CTO advisory
Architecture and buy-vs-build review before you commit. Best at the design stage.
Questions
FAQ: AML transaction monitoring software
Six answers up front on scope, ownership, deepfake-aware KYC, vendors, evidence and fit with existing tooling. Bring the rest to the call.
What does compliance AML KYC & monitoring cover in a TrustChange build?
One system covers customer and counterparty screening (sanctions, PEP, adverse media), transaction monitoring on fiat and crypto legs, wallet-risk enrichment, KYC / KYB with deepfake-aware liveness, alert-to-case output, and SAR/STR draft preparation. It ships as source code in your repositories, with the IP assigned to you and the rules versioned in your admin console. There is no per-alert fee and no shared multi-tenant backend between you and your MLRO.
How is your build different from an off-the-shelf AML compliance screening solution?
Off-the-shelf products bundle a generic rule set and a vendor lock behind a licence. TrustChange is an engineering partner: the screening pipeline, the monitoring engine, the KYC flow and the case output are engineered against your actual rails, risk appetite and licence context. A bespoke build takes longer up front, but you keep every rule, every adapter and every alert-to-case decision — and you can swap vendors without renegotiating a contract.
How does deepfake detection for AML compliance work in the KYC flow?
Onboarding and step-up runs a document check, a proof-of-address check and a liveness check with deepfake-aware signals — motion consistency, presentation-attack detection and challenge-response prompts through your identity vendor. Failed or borderline checks open cases in the analyst queue instead of blocking silently, so the analyst sees the vendor evidence and can decide. KYC/AML deepfake-detection compliance is treated as one control among many, wired to the same case output as sanctions and wallet-risk hits.
Which vendors can you wire in for AML compliance sanction screening, PEP and wallet risk?
The pipeline is vendor-agnostic. Screening adapters cover the major sanctions, PEP and adverse-media providers and can add new ones without touching the monitoring engine. A PEP screening API compliance AML integration slots into the same adapter contract as sanctions and adverse media. Wallet screening tools for AML compliance plug in beside fiat screening, so a single alert can reason across fiat and on-chain legs. Your compliance team owns which vendor is authoritative and which is a second opinion.
How is AML compliance and fraud detection engineered without invented guarantees?
TrustChange is an engineering partner, not a law firm — your MLRO and compliance advisers set the policy; we ship the controls, the tests and the evidence. We do not claim licence status, supervisor approval, false-positive rates or detection guarantees on your behalf. What we do commit to is engineering discipline: rules are testable, decisions are logged with a version, overrides carry four-eyes, and the whole pipeline can be replayed against historical data before a rule change ships to production.
How does this fit with an existing AML compliance tracking or case-management setup?
The monitoring engine can push alerts into your existing case system, or hand them to our own AML case management software development build if you want one owner across both. Either way, the pipeline reconciles to your rails, your ledger and your reporting cadence, and the audit bundle is exportable for supervisor requests — nothing about your existing MLRO tooling, chart of accounts or period locks is silently rewritten.
Book a discovery call for AML compliance monitoring
Bring your rails, your current vendors, your licence context and where the pain sits — false-positive fatigue, PEP screening latency, wallet-risk gaps or SAR/STR evidence. We come back with a control map, an architecture view and a costed plan. No demo theatre.